🔗 Share this article

Internationally, governments are pouring hundreds of billions into the concept of “sovereign AI” – building their own AI models. Starting with Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, states are competing to build AI that comprehends local languages and cultural specifics.

The Worldwide AI Arms Race

This trend is an element in a wider worldwide competition led by tech giants from the United States and China. While firms like OpenAI and a social media giant pour enormous resources, developing countries are additionally taking their own gambles in the artificial intelligence domain.

Yet with such tremendous investments at stake, is it possible for smaller states attain notable advantages? According to an expert from an influential research institute, “Unless you’re a rich government or a large corporation, it’s a significant burden to develop an LLM from the ground up.”

Defence Concerns

Numerous nations are reluctant to use foreign AI technologies. Across India, for instance, American-made AI systems have at times proven inadequate. An illustrative instance saw an AI agent employed to teach learners in a isolated community – it spoke in the English language with a thick US accent that was hard to understand for local students.

Furthermore there’s the state security dimension. In the Indian security agencies, using particular foreign systems is seen as inadmissible. As one founder commented, It's possible it contains some unvetted data source that may state that, such as, Ladakh is not part of India … Utilizing that certain model in a security environment is a big no-no.”

He further stated, I’ve discussed with individuals who are in defence. They want to use AI, but, forget about particular tools, they are reluctant to rely on American technologies because information may be transferred abroad, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

Homegrown Efforts

In response, several states are supporting national ventures. An example this effort is underway in India, wherein an organization is attempting to develop a domestic LLM with public funding. This effort has committed approximately $1.25bn to machine learning progress.

The expert envisions a model that is more compact than leading models from Western and Eastern firms. He states that the country will have to compensate for the funding gap with skill. Based in India, we lack the option of investing huge sums into it,” he says. “How do we compete with say the $100 or $300 or $500bn that the United States is investing? I think that is where the core expertise and the intellectual challenge is essential.”

Regional Priority

Throughout the city-state, a state-backed program is backing AI systems developed in local native tongues. These particular tongues – for example Malay, the Thai language, Lao, Indonesian, the Khmer language and others – are frequently inadequately covered in American and Asian LLMs.

I wish the experts who are building these national AI models were informed of just how far and how quickly the frontier is moving.

An executive engaged in the initiative notes that these systems are created to supplement bigger systems, rather than displacing them. Systems such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he comments, frequently find it challenging to handle regional languages and cultural aspects – interacting in awkward the Khmer language, for example, or proposing non-vegetarian meals to Malay users.

Developing native-tongue LLMs permits local governments to include cultural sensitivity – and at least be “smart consumers” of a advanced technology built overseas.

He adds, “I’m very careful with the concept independent. I think what we’re attempting to express is we aim to be better represented and we want to understand the abilities” of AI platforms.

International Partnership

For nations seeking to establish a position in an intensifying worldwide landscape, there’s another possibility: team up. Analysts affiliated with a well-known institution have suggested a government-backed AI initiative shared among a alliance of developing nations.

They refer to the project “a collaborative AI effort”, in reference to Europe’s successful initiative to build a rival to Boeing in the mid-20th century. This idea would involve the establishment of a state-backed AI entity that would pool the capabilities of several states’ AI initiatives – such as the United Kingdom, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, Germany, Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, France, Switzerland and the Kingdom of Sweden – to develop a strong competitor to the US and Chinese leaders.

The lead author of a paper setting out the concept states that the proposal has gained the consideration of AI officials of at least a few nations to date, as well as multiple state AI organizations. Although it is now centered on “developing countries”, less wealthy nations – the nation of Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda for example – have likewise indicated willingness.

He elaborates, “Nowadays, I think it’s just a fact there’s less trust in the commitments of the existing White House. Experts are questioning like, is it safe to rely on these technologies? Suppose they decide to